thesoulpurposedotorg

I happened to read and hear the musings of two aging spiritual giants this past week: The Rev. Billy Graham and The Rev. Gardner Taylor, both men in the 80’s. Graham is featured in this week’s Newsweek and Taylor was interviewed on PBS Relgion and Ethics Newsweekly Each man spoke of a similiar regret in life. This is my interpretation of their regret: that they did not spend more time in simply being in God’s presence. In Taylor’s words:

Taylor keeps busy, but in recent years, he says he’s begun to practice what 19th-century British pastor Alexander McLaren called “sitting silent before God.”

Rev. TAYLOR: This is not praying, it is not reading, it is just opening oneself. It’s a mystic kind of thing. But we do so little of it, and we who preach are likely to engage ourselves in so many things and to neglect that aspect of being open to what God has to say. And I wish to heaven I had practiced this more early on in my ministry.

Graham speaks more of a desire to have studied more but returns each night when he wakes from a restless sleep, to repeat the 23rd Psalm. The writer describes Graham this way:

“A unifying theme of Graham’s new thinking is humility….I believe the love of God is absolute. He said he gave his son for the whole world and I think he loves everybody regardless of what label they have.”

I’m about three decades short of these men’s years and likely eons short of their wisdom and paltry in terms of effectiveness in ministry. But I certainly do know of what they speak. The sweet priviledge of simply sitting in God’s presence is something that doesn’t have to wait until we leave this earthly realm. God longs for us to just be present and life becomes so much less chaotic and confusing when we do.

Simply put: Either embrace the Mystery or be destined to confusion.

Read Full Post »

I’m about half way through a series of novels by Phil Rickman featuring an Anglican priest by the name of Merrily Watkins. Although these are mystery novels, they are also well researched in areas of mystical Christianity versus New Age religions, paganism, Pentecostalism and much more. The main character being an ordained woman and single parent of a teenage young woman is especially intriguing and more than a little close to my own history. I am enjoying them immensely and learning various historical nuances of New Age and other religious practices. For example, I did not know that Wicca arose in the 1960’s as a conglomeration of celtic pagan practices.
An older set of novels by Susan Howatch have long been be my favorite. The series on the Church of England and various ministries of healing and deliverance are probably the only books I have read two or three times. These novels are set in the 1920’s through the end of that century and therefore do not deal with more recent challenges to the ways of Christ. However, the quotes at the beginning of each chapter and some sections of the novels themselves are so profound and challenging that I re-read them as spiritual food.

Read Full Post »

Perhaps I first heard this term in a British movie or novel. Or perhaps it was my own mother who said in response to my exuberance “Contain yourself!” This is hard to do! Easier as the years go by, self-containment has become a virtue I admire and one I attempt to espouse. Whether it be joy, sorrow, pain, fear, or anger, “containing myself” seems to enable a moment of extremity to become a teaching moment with the gift of wisdom. It is not, however, my natural state! Such containment is a painful and constant discipline.

Imagine God containing God-self in the body of an infant child. Was that painful? Did it take the energy of the universe to make this possible? The images of God’s creation in space that we have just now begun to see through the Hubble telescope show a God of exuberance and joyous dance, riotous color and un-contained passion. But to become a human child took Self-Containment that is un-imaginable and therefore, unbelievable to many.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

I’m reading The Soul of Christianity by Huston Smith. I found this helpful:

Religions have outsides and insides: they have outer, exoteric forms that house inner, esoteric cores. People differ on which of these stands out more clearly for them. For esoterics God is in the focal view, whereas for exoterics his created world is focal and God must be inferred from it. It follows that for exoterics this world is concrete and the celestial world is abstract, whereas for esoterics it is the other way around….Esoterics can understand exoterics and recognize their need for them, but the reverse does not hold. …Every where in history exoterics far outnumber esoterics and the religious institutions run mostly on the energy they provide.

(more…)

Read Full Post »